O fazendeiro Bill Gates é agora o maior proprietário de terras agrícolas nos EUA - o bilionário Gates compra 242.000 acres (98.000 hectares) em 18 estados:
Raquel Varela - 2:47m
https://www.facebook.com/
By John C. A. Manley
Global Research
January 26, 2021
Nine Potential and Proven Dangers to Muzzling Yourself
1. Cavities: New York dentists are reporting that half their patients are suffering decaying teeth, receding gum lines and seriously sour breath from wearing masks. “We’re seeing inflammation in people’s gums that have been healthy forever, and cavities in people who have never had them before,” Dr. Rob Ramondi told FOX News.
2. Facial Deformities: Masking children triggers mouth breathing which as been shown to cause “long, narrow faces, narrow mouths, high palatal vaults, dental malocclusion, gummy smiles, and many other unattractive facial features,” according to the Journal of General Dentistry.
3. Acne Vulgaris: Moisture and germs collecting in the mask cause “facial skin lesions, irritant dermatitis… or worsening acne” (according to Public Health Ontario) which stresses the immune system, can lead to permanent scarring and has been linked to depression and suicidal thoughts (according to the Journal of Dermatologic Clinics). Children also develop impetigo, a bacterial infection that produces red sores and can lead to kidney damage (according to the Mayo Clinic).
4. Increased Risk of COVID-19: “Mask use by the general public could be associated with a theoretical elevated risk of COVID-19 through… self-contamination,” states Public Health Ontario in Wearing Masks in Public and COVID-19. “By wearing a mask, the exhaled viruses will not be able to escape and will concentrate in the nasal passages, enter the olfactory nerves and travel into the brain,” theorizes nationally recognized board-certified neurosurgeon, Dr. Russell Blaylock, MD (in an article at The Centre for Research on Globalization).Buy New $51.00(as of 04:50 EST - Details)
5. Bacterial Pneumonia: At an Oklahoma Press Conference, Dr. James Meehan, MD testified: “Reports coming from my colleagues all over the world are suggesting that the bacterial pneumonias are on the rise” as a result of moisture collecting in face masks.
6. Immune Suppressing: Masks are often worn by criminals trying to hide their identity while perpetuating an offence (theft, violence, rape, murder, etc.). They produce subconscious anxiety and fear. Fear and anxiety activate the fight-or-flight nervous system which down-regulates the immune system, as shown in a study by the American Psychological Association.
7. Germophobia: Masks create an irrational fear of germs and a false sense of protection from disease, leading to antisocial (or even hostile) behaviour towards those not wearing a mask. (See the paper in the Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders titled “COVID-19, obsessive-compulsive disorder and invisible life forms that threaten the self”).
Medical Doctor Warns that “Bacterial Pneumonias Are on the Rise” from Mask Wearing
8. Toxic: Many (if not most) masks and face coverings (including cloth) are made with toxic and carcinogenic chemicals including fire retardant, fibreglass, lead, NFE, phthalates, polyfluorinated chemicals and formaldehyde that will outgas and be inhaled by the wearer. (See “5 main hazardous chemicals in clothing from China named” by Fashion United).
9. Psychologically Harmful: “I believe the real threat right now is what we’re doing to sabotage the mental, emotional and physical health of… our children, whose development is dependent on social interactions, physical contact and facial expressions,” writes Dr. Joseph Mercola of Mercola.com. “Between mask wearing and social distancing, I fear the impact on children in particular may be long-term, if not permanent.”
Six Proofs Masks Do Not Reduce Infections
1. Insubstantial: A CDC-funded review on masking in May 2020 came to the conclusion: “Although mechanistic studies support the potential effect of hand hygiene or face masks, evidence from 14 randomized controlled trials of these measures did not support a substantial effect on transmission of laboratory-confirmed influenza… None of the household studies reported a significant reduction in secondary laboratory-confirmed influenza virus infections in the face mask group.” If masks can’t stop the regular flu, how can they stop SAR-CoV-2?
2. Unreasonable: “Evidence that masking as a source [of] control results in any material reduction in transmission was scant, anecdotal, and, in the overall, lacking… [and mandatory masking] is the exact opposite of being reasonable,” ruled a hospital arbitrator in a dispute between The Ontario Nurses’ Association and the Toronto Academic Health Science Network.
3. Ineffective: “Oral masks in healthy individuals are ineffective against the spread of viral infections,” write Belgian medical doctors in an open letter published in The American Institute of Stress, September 24, 2020.
4. Unsanitary: “It has never been shown that wearing surgical face masks decreases postoperative wound infections,” writes Göran Tunevall, M.D. in the World Journal of Surgery. “On the contrary, a 50% decrease [in bacterial infection] has been reported after omitting face masks.”
5. No Protection: “There were 17 eligible studies.… None of the studies established a conclusive relationship between mask ⁄ respirator use and protection against influenza infection,” concludes a research review in the journal Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses.
6. Unproven: Dutch Minister for Medical Care, Tamara van Ark, asserted that “from a medical perspective there is no proven effectiveness of masks” after a review by the National Institute for Health on July 29, 2020 (according to Reuters).
Five Ways Forced Masking is Immoral
1. Reckless: “By making mask-wearing recommendations and policies for the general public, or by expressly condoning the practice, governments have both ignored the scientific evidence and done the opposite of following the precautionary principle,” writes Denis Rancourt, PhD in his 2020 paper Masks Don’t Work.Buy New $39.99(as of 04:50 EST - Details)
2. Manipulative: Dr. Andreas Voss, member of the World Health Organization expert team and head of microbiology at a Dutch hospital in Nijmegen, on July 24, 2020, told I Am Expat that masks were made mandatory “not because of scientific evidence, but because of political pressure and public opinion.”
3. Fear-Mongering: “In fact, there is no study to even suggest that it makes any sense for healthy individuals to wear masks in public,” write Drs. Karina Reiss, Phd and Dr. Sucharit Bakdi, MD in Corona, False Alarm? “One might suspect that the only political reason for enforcing the measure is to foster fear in the population.”
4. Totalitarian: “If you look at the history of totalitarian regimes… they all do the same thing, which is they try to crush culture, and crush any evidence of self-expression…” explains Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. in an interview regarding face masks. “And what is the ultimate vector for self-expression? It’s your facial expressions…. [Yet] we’ve all been told to put on the burqa and be obedient.”
5. Virtue-Signalling: “Masks are utterly useless,” testified Dr. Roger Hodkinson, a pathologist, certified with the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, at a city council meeting. “…masks are simply virtue-signalling… It’s utterly ridiculous seeing these unfortunate, uneducated people — I’m not saying that in a pejorative sense — walking around like lemmings, obeying without any knowledge base, to put the mask on their face.”
https://paradigmas.online/saude/covid-19/obito-por-covid-19/
Hospitais de todo o mundo são instados a definir como causa de morte a COVID-19, em caso de comorbilidade com outras doenças. Assim, seja por que for que as pessoas tenham realmente falecido, a causa é sempre ou quase sempre registada como tendo sido de COVID-19.
A nota é redigida pela ICD (International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems) e aplicada em todo o mundo. [1][2]
Segundo código do ICD para a COVID-19 ( U07.1 ), o certificado de óbito para um paciente falecido será COVID-19, assumindo que foi essa a causa ou que contribuiu para a morte.
Ainda há um segundo código ( U07.2 ) que refere a determinação da morte por COVID-19, ainda que a pessoa não tenha sido testada, bastando para isso, que o clínico assuma que a pessoa estivesse infectada pelo vírus. Ou seja, a decisão aqui ganha contornos completamente subjectivos.
No primeiro código, a pessoa é testada, com resultado positivo, embora aí dependa da enorme taxa de falsos positivos. [3] No segundo, é considerada morte por COVID-19, embora nem sequer tenha sido testada (apenas por suspeita).
Um estudo da Universidade de Oxford, de Yoon K. Loke e Carl Heneghan, intitulado «Why no-one can ever recover from COVID-19 in England – a statistical anomaly» (“Porque é que ninguém irá alguma vez recuperar da COVID-19 em Inglaterra – uma anomalia estatística“), os autores, acedendo aos dados da contabilização de óbitos por COVID-19, e tendo verificado os parâmetros para essa contabilização, concluíram que não só todos aqueles que são testados como positivo ao SARS-CoV-2, através do teste PCR são definidos como mortes por COVID-19, como também, essas pessoas ficam virtualmente para sempre vinculadas à COVID-19. [4][5]
Ou seja, mesmo que a pessoa venha a falecer 1 mês, 2 meses, 6 meses ou seja quando for e de que forma for (pode até ser por atropelamento), é contabilizada como óbito por COVID-19.
Em Nova York, a partir de determinada altura, começou a utilizar-se o segundo código fornecido pelo ICD ( U07.2 ), para determinar os óbitos por COVID-19, ou seja, por suposição, tendo a adopção dessa prática tido um efeito explosivo no aumento do número de mortes contabilizadas. [6]
No entanto, posteriormente, a CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention – Centro de Controle e Prevenção de Doenças) norte-americana fez, de forma discreta, uma revisão do número de mortes atribuído à COVID-19. Afinal, dos contabilizados, apenas 6% faleceram efectivamente de COVID-19. [7]
O professor Walter Ricciardi, conselheiro científico do Ministro da Saúde italiano afirmou: “A forma como classificamos as mortes no nosso país foi muito generosa, no sentido em que todas as pessoas que morreram com o Corona Vírus foram classificadas como tendo morrido de Corona Vírus. Numa re-avaliação feita pelo Instituto Nacional de Saúde, em apenas 12% dos certificados de morte parece haver uma causalidade directa com o Corona Vírus, enquanto 88% dos pacientes que faleceram, tinha pelo menos outra doença – muitos tinham duas e três.” [8]
Neste vídeo Graça Freitas, a directora da Direção Geral de Saúde (DGS) explica como são contabilizadas as mortes por COVID-19 (qualquer pessoa que teste positivo, ainda que faleça por outras causas).
Como se classifica óbito por COVID-19? Bastante simples: Toda e qualquer pessoa que tenha testado positivo no teste PCR.
Este vídeo, entre outras coisas, apresenta vários relatos de pessoas que afirmam que os seus familiares morreram de várias patologias, mas foram classificados como morte por COVID-19.
Os serviços de saúde nos Estados Unidos são privados e como tal, recorrem a seguradoras. A seguradora Medicare oferece uma bonificação de 20% no caso de se tratar de um paciente com COVID-19. [9]
O senador Scott Jensen, médico do Minnesota, entrevistado na Fox News, declarou que os hospitais recebem mais dinheiro se os pacientes Medicare forem listados como tendo COVID-19, e recebem 3 vezes mais se forem ventilados. Normalmente o pagamento da Medicare é de 5 mil dólares, mas se se tratar de uma pneumonia relacionada com COVID-19, passa a ser de 13 mil dólares e se for utilizado um ventilador vai até aos 39 mil dólares. [10]
Scott Jensen refere estarem assim criadas as condições para que haja conflito de interesses dos médicos e hospitais, no sentido de favorecerem um diagnóstico de COVID-19 pelas vantagens financeiras que isso acarreta.
Tendo em conta o exposto neste artigo, fica bem patente que a forma como se tem contabilizado a mortalidade por COVID-19 tem potenciado enormemente os números. Se a isso adicionarmos a enorme taxa de falsos positivos verificados pelo teste PCR aplicado em massa,[3] chegamos à conclusão que esta pandemia deve a sua existencia à forma como se tem manipulado estes dois factores.
[3] Teste PCR: participação na Pandemia da COVID-19. Paradigmas. 18 de Novembro de 2020.
[6] Death toll soars after New York City counts ‘probable’ fatalities. PBS. 14 de Abril de 2020.
[8] Why have so many coronavirus patients died in Italy?. The Telegraph. 23 de Março de 2020.
[10] Minnesota doctor blasts ‘ridiculous’ CDC coronavirus death count guidelines. Fox News. 9 de Abril.
